Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Study of High Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow Firms

  • Dan Lin Takming University of Science and Technology
  • Lu Lin Takming University of Science and Technology
Keywords: Agency cost of free cash flow; Corporate governance; Agency problem; Firm performance

Abstract

Excessive free cash flows can lead to high agency problems as retaining free cash flow reduces the ability of capital market to monitor managers. Managers are also likely to waste the free cash flow on value-decreasing investments. Based on the free cash flow hypothesis, this study examines the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance of a sample of high agency costs of free cash flow firms, which is defined as firms that have high free cash flow and low investment opportunities. The sample firms are extracted from firms listed on the S&P/TSX composite index between 2009 and 2012. Using corporate governance scores provided by The Globe and Mail, this study finds that better corporate governance is associated with better firm performance, measured by return on equity. The results highlight the importance of corporate governance in protecting shareholders’ interests.

References

ARORA, A. & SHARMA, C. 2016. Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: evidence from India. Corporate Governance, 16, 420-436.

BEBCHUK, L. A. & FRIED, J. M. 2003. Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 17-92.

BHAGAT, S. & BOLTON, B. 2008. Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 257-273.

BRUSH, T. H., BROMILEY, P. & HENDRICKX, M. 2000. The free cash flow hypothesis for sales growth and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 455-472.

BUALLAY, A., HAMDAN, A. & ZUREIGAT, Q. 2017. Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11, 78-98.

DANOSHANA, M. S. & RAVIVATHANI, M. T. 2013. The impact of the corporate governance on firm performance: A study on financial institutions in Sri Lanka. Merit Research Journal of Accounting, Auditing, Economics and Finance, 1, 118-121.

FALLATAH, Y. & DICKINS, D. 2012. Corporate governnace and firm performance and value in Saudi Arabia. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 10025-10034.

FAMA, E. F. & JENSEN, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.

GUO, Z. & KGA, U. K. 2012. Corporate governance and firm performance of listed firms in Sri Lanka. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 664-667.

GUPTA, P. & SHARMA, A. M. 2014. A study of the impact of corporate governance practices on firm performance in Indian and South Korean companies. Precedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 4-11.

JENSEN, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.

JENSEN, M. C. & MECKLING, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.

KANDUKURI, R. L., MEMDANI, L. & BABU, P. R. 2015. Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance – A Study of Selected Indian Listed Companies. In: KENSINGER, J. W. (ed.) Research in Finance (Overlaps of Private Sector with Public Sector around the Globe). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

KHAN, W., NAZ, A., KHAN, M., WASEEM, K. Q. & SHABEER, A. 2013. The impact of capital structure and financial performance: A case of Pakistan textile industry. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 16, 289-95.

PALANIAPPAN, G. 2017. Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to board characteristics of corporate governance in Indian manufacturing industry: An empirical study. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26, 67-85.

PANDE, S. 2012. The Direction of Future Research in Corporate Governance. SSRN working paper.

ROSENBERG, M. 2003. Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: Evidence from Finland. Swedish School of Economics and Business Adminstration, Working Papers - 497.

ROUDAKI, J. & BHUIYAN, M. B. 2015. Interlocking Directorship in New Zealand. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 9, 45-58.

SIDDIQUI, S. S. 2015. The association between corporate governance and firm performance – a meta-analysis. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 23, 218-237.

SUEYOSHI, T., GOTO, M. & OMI, Y. 2010. Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing industries after the lost decade. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 724-736.

TOSI, H. L. & GOMEZ-MEJIA, L. R. 1989. The decoupling of CEO pay and performance: An agency theory perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 169-190.

WORLD BANK GROUP 1992. Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (the UK Cadbury Code), London, URL: https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/ifc+cg/priorities/why+corporate+governance.

Published
2018-07-31
How to Cite
Lin, D., & Lin, L. (2018). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Study of High Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow Firms. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 12(2), 2724-2731. https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v12i2.7533
Section
Articles