Neoliberal Democratic Reforms in Post-Gaddafi Era: Implications for Political Stability in Libya, 2011-2016
This study investigates the neoliberal democratic reforms in post-Gaddafi era and its implications for political stability in Libya. Specifically, the study examined the contradictions of the ruling class project of democratization in Libya and their implications for political instability in the post-Gaddafi era. The study found that the democratic project as propagated by the ruling class in post-Gaddafiâ€™s Libya is an intrinsic feature of modernization, a transition from authoritarian to more open political systems, a process linking economic reform and political liberalization perceived as not expressing an organic unity, but separate and either consecutively or concurrently linked. By viewing political instability as an inevitable pendulum of the cyclical transition from authoritarian to more democratic system, neoliberal democracy in post-Gaddafiâ€™s Libya legitimizes authoritarianism in so far as it promotes modernization and liberal system of free market economy. The implication of the study is that the adoption of a new economic system, as well as western-style political institutions in post-Gaddafi Libya, relegating the consultation and active participation of the Libyan people undermined the democratic project. The exclusion of Libyans in the democratization process ultimately gave rise to political instability in post-revolution Libya. We therefore, recommended a referendum as a preferred option for Libyans to decide economic and political organization of Libya.
 Azikiwe, A. 2013. â€œNo Unifying Political Ideology to Guide Post-Gaddafi Libyaâ€. Available at www.panafricannews.com
 Bangura, Y. 1991. Authoritarian Rule and Democracy in Africa: A Theoretical Discourse. UNRISD
 Doug, M. 2011. â€œU.S Pushing UN Security Council to Authorize Direct Intervention in Libyaâ€. Available at www.reuters.co.uk
 Human Rights Watch. 2012. Human Rights Report on Libya
 J. Abadi, â€œPragmatism and Rhetoric in Libyaâ€™s Policy Toward Israelâ€, Journal of Conflict Studies, 2000, 20 (1)
 Khalifa, F. 2013. â€œNTC Arab Ideology is Dividing Libyaâ€. Available at www.wikipedia.com/libyaâ€™s transitionprogram
 Libya Ministry of Interior. 2013. Official Crime Report
 Mary, B. 2012. â€œObama: Gaddafi Death Marks End of â€˜Long and Painful Chapterâ€. Available at www.abcnews.com
 Mikail, B. 2013. Libyaâ€™s Turbulent Transition: The Pressing Needs for Security Sector Reform. POMED
 Nasir, K. 2014. Post-Gaddafi: Understanding the Forces Shaping a Fragile Democracy and a Floundering State. Freedom Observatory.
 R. Laremont, â€œAfter the Fall of Qaddafi: Political, Economic and Security Consequences for Libya, Mali, Niger, and Algeriaâ€ International Journal Stability, Security and Development, 2014,1 (3).
 Schell, B. 2012. â€œInstability Reigns in Post-Gaddafi Libyaâ€. Available at www.palestinechronicle.com
 Schumpeter, J.1960. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper and Row
 Shah, A. 2013. â€œLibyaâ€™s Stolen Revolution: Mapping the Post Gaddafi Eraâ€. Available at www.countercurrents.org /shah151013.htn
 Tefiani, H. 2013. Libya, Two Years After Gaddafi. New Political Centre
 U.S Department of State. 2012. Reports on U.S involvement in Libya
 Vandewalle, D. 2006. A History of Modern Libya. University Press
 Villard, H. 1956. Libya: The New Arab Kingdom of North Africa. Cornell University Press
Copyright (c) 2018 JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. The submitting author is responsible for securing any permissions needed for the reuse of copyrighted materials included in the manuscript.
While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.