The Impact of Information and Communication Technology Application on the 2015 General Elections in Nigeria
The electoral procedure in Nigeria over time has been marred by violence, partly as a result of the lack of confidence in the electoral commission and the entire process. This study examined the impact of the application of ICT on the conduct of the 2015 general elections in Nigeria, and argued that technological innovations associated with the general elections improved the credibility of the outcome. This led to high approval ratings by electoral observers, reduced cases of post-election petition and violence, as well as renewed confidence in the electoral umpire (INEC) by the citizens. The study observed that there were some technical challenges associated with the adoption of biometric voting technology, mostly as a result of the novelty of the machines and a low-level of ICT literacy in the country. The study however supported the adoption and sustenance of such technologies in the electoral process. Thus, it recommended that there is a need to reform the Electoral Act so as to institutionalize the electronic voting system in the country, as well as improve on political education of citizens on the use of electronic machines in the electoral process in Nigeria.
Agbu, O. (2015). Unbridled election rigging and the use of technology: The smart card reader as the “joker” in Nigeria’s 2015 presidential election. A paper presented at a two-day national conference on The 2015 General Elections in Nigeria: The Real Issues between 27th and 28th July.
Alebiosu, E.A. (2015). Smart Card Reader and the 2015 general elections in Nigeria. A paper presented at a two-day national conference on The 2015 General Elections in Nigeria: The Real Issues between 27th and 28th July.
Bolaji, K. (2015). Towards institutionalizing credible elections in Nigeria: A review of reform measures by the independent national electoral commission. In International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2015.Extracted from Improving Electoral Practices: Case Studies and Practical Approaches, pp. 49-82.
Eguavon Augustine Ainabor (2009), “Problems of Elections and Imperatives of Reforms in Nigeria‟s Democratic Process”, The Constitution, Vol.9, No.3, September
Jega Attahiru (2014), Electoral Reforms in Nigeria: Prospects and Challenges, INEC.
Kwaghga, B. (2012). Good governance and credible elections in Nigeria. Journal of Social Science and Public Policy, 4: 65-72.
Major, N. B. (2013). The role of information communication technology (ICT) in enhancing the quality assurance procedures of Nigerian universities: A review of literature. International Journal of Educational Foundations and Management, 1(1), 42-48. Retrieved from http://www.ijefm.com
Ndujihe, C. & Kumolu, C. (2015, May 2). 2015: Are the polls really credible, free and fair? Vanguard. Retrieved from: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/05/2015-are-the-polls- really-credible-free-and-fair/.
Nigeria Civil Society (NCS) Situation Room, (2015). Why permanent voter’s card and card readers should matter to voters: www.situationroom.placng.org
Nigeria Civil Society (NCS) Situation Room, (2015). Understanding the use of permanent voter’s card (pvc) and the card reader in the 2015 elections www.situationroom.placng.org
Nwangwu, C. (2015). Biometric voting technology and the 2015 General Elections in Nigeria. A Paper Presented at aTwo-Day National Conference on The 2015 General Elections in Nigeria: The Real Issues between 27th and 28th July.
Nwokeafor, C.U. (2013): Transparency in the polls: A review of the role of independent National electoral commission (INEC) and the Nigerian television authority (NTA) in the April 2011 general elections in Nigeria. A paper presented at the International conference on ICT for Africa in Harare, Zimbabwe between February 20th and 23rd.
Oche, M. (2015).What difference did the card readers make? Retrieved on 19/110/2015 from http%34%2Fleadership.ng%2Fnews%2F423212%2Felections-what-difference-did-the-card-readers-make&t_e
Omodia, S.M. (2009). Elections and democratic survival in the fourth republic of Nigeria.The Journal of Pan African Studies, 3(3): 35-42.
Piccolino, G. (2015). What other African elections tell us about Nigeria’s bet on biometrics. Available at www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/03/10/what-other-african-elections-tell-us-about-nigerias-bet-on-biometrics/.Accessed 17 October.
The Carter Center & NDI (1999).Observing the 1998-99 Nigeria elections: Final report.WWW.NDI.ORG&WWW.CARTERCENTER.ORG
The National Democratic Institute (NDI)(2003), “Election Special”, The News Magazine, Vol.20, No.15.
Transition Monitoring Group (TMG) (2007), An Election Programmed to Fail: Final Report of the April 2007 General Elections in Nigeria, July.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. The submitting author is responsible for securing any permissions needed for the reuse of copyrighted materials included in the manuscript.
While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.