Morphological variations of the shell of the bivalve Lucina pectinata (Gmelin, 1791)

  • emma MODESTIN University of the French Antilles, UMR AREA DEV
Keywords: Lucina pectinata, polymorphism of shape of shell, ecology, mangrove swamp, French Antilles


In Martinique, the species Lucina pectinata (Gmelin, 1791) is called "mud clam, white clam or mangrove clam" by bivalve fishermen depending on the harvesting environment. Indeed, the individuals collected have differences as regards the shape and colour of the shell. The hypothesis is that the shape of the shell of L. pectinata (P. pectinatus) shows significant variations from one population to another. This paper intends to verify this hypothesis by means of a simple morphometric study. The comparison of the shape of the shell of individuals from different populations was done based on samples taken at four different sites. The standard measurements (length (L), width or thickness (E - épaisseur) and height (H)) were taken and the morphometric indices (L/H; L/E; E/H) were established. These indices of shape differ significantly among the various populations. This intraspecific polymorphism of the shape of the shell of P. pectinatus could be related to the nature of the sediment (granulometry, density, hardness) and/or the predation. The shells are significantly more elongated in a loose muddy sediment than in a hard muddy sediment or one rich in clay. They are significantly more convex in brackish environments and this is probably due to the presence of more specialised predators or of more muddy sediments.




Download data is not yet available.


1. Abbott, R. T.1974. American scashclls. The marine Mollusca of the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of North America.-.New York (Nam Nostrana Reinhold Company). 663pp
2. AcerCampestre-LierdemanConsultants, 2007.Inventaire des zones humides de la Martinique. Rapport de synthèse. Parc Naturel Régional de la Martinique.106pp
3. Adey W. H., Adey P. J., Burke R. and Kaufmann L. 1977. The Holocene reef systems of Eastern Martinique, French West Indies. Atoll Research Bulletin 218: 1-40.
4. Akberali, H. B. and Trueman, E. R. 1985. Effects of environmental stress on marine bivalve molluscs. Adv. Mar. Biol, 22, 101-198.
5. Akester, R. J.and Martel, A. L. 2000 .Shell shape, dysodont tooth morphology, and hinge-ligament thickness in the bay
mussel Mytilustrossulus correlate with wave exposure. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78(2), 240-253.
6. Alunno-Bruscia M, Bourget E and Frechette M 2001. Shell allometry and length-mass-density relationship for Mytilus edulis in an experimental food-regulated situation. Mar EcolProgSer 219:177–188
7. Alyakrinskaya, I. O.2005. Functional significance and weight properties of the shell in some mollusks. Biology Bulletin, 32(4), 397-418.
8. Anderson, L. C. 2014. Relationships of internal shell features to chemosymbiosis, life position, and geometric constraints within the Lucinidae (Bivalvia).In Experimental Approaches to Understanding Fossil Organisms (pp. 49-72).Springer Netherlands.
9. Assis, R. C. F.1978. Anatomia funcional de Lucina pectinata (Gmelin, 1791)(Bivalvia: Lucinidae), um subsídioaoconhecimento do ciclo sexual (Doctoral dissertation, Tese de doutorado, Instituto de Biociências da USP, 93pp).
10. abin C, 1966. Mollusques, Bivalves et Céphalopode du paléozoïque armoricain.Etude systématique. Essai sur la philogénie des Bivalves.Esquisse paléo-écologique.I.C.A, Brest, 471p. ,18pl.
11. Barroso, C. X. and Matthews-Cascon, H. E. L. E. N. A. 2009. Distribuição espacial e temporal da malacofauna no estuário do rioCeará, Ceará, Brasil.Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 4(1), 79-86.
12. Beadman H, Caldow R, Kaiser M,and Willows R. 2003. How to toughen up your mussels: using mussel shell morphological plasticity to reduce predation losses. Mar Biol 142:487–494. doi:10.1007/ s00227-002-0977-4
13. Ben Ouada, H., Medhioub, M. N.,Medhioub, A., Jammoussi, H. and Beji, M. 1998 .Variabilité morphométrique de la palourde Ruditapes decussatus (Linné, 1758) le long des côtes tunisiennes. Haliotis, 27, 43-55.
14. Bertness M. and Grosholz E 1985. Population dynamics of the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa: the costs and benefits of an aggregated distribution. Oecologia 67:192–204
15. Blundon, J. A.and Kennedy, V. S.1982. Mechanical and behavioral aspects of blue crab, Callinectes sapidus (Rathbun), predation on Chesapeake Bay bivalves. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 65(1), 47-65.
16. Boretto, G. M., Baranzelli, M. C., Gordillo, S., Consoloni, I., Zanchetta, G.and Morán, G.2014). Shell morphometric variations in a Patagonian Argentina clam (Ameghinomya antiqua) from the Mid-Pleistocene (MIS 7) to the present.Quaternary International, 352, 48-58.
17. Bouchon, C.and Laborel, J.1986. Les peuplements coralliens des côtes de la Martinique. In Annales de l'Institut océanographique (Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 199-238).
18. Boulding, E. G.1984. Crab-resistant features of shells of burrowing bivalves: decreasing vulnerability by increasing handling time. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 76(3), 201-223.
19. Briones, C.and Guiñez, R. 2005. Asimetría bilateral de la forma de las valvas y posiciónespacial en matrices delchoritoPeru mytilus purpuratus (Lamarck, 1819)(Bivalvia: Mytilidae). Revistachilena de historia natural, 78(1), 3-14.
20. Brugneaux S/OMM.2006. Contributions aux inventaires floristiques et faunistiques de Martinique. Rapport de Synthèse. Programme ZNIEFF Mer.Le récif méridional de Martinique. 107pp
21. Caro, A. U.and Castilla,J.C.2004. Predator-inducible defences and local intrapopulation variability of the intertidal mussel Semimytilus algosus in central Chile. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 276, 115-123.
22. Caill-Milly, N., Bru, N., Barranger, M., Gallon, L.and D'amico, F.2014.Morphological trends of four Manila clam populations (Venerupis philippinarum) on the French Atlantic Coast: identified spatial patterns and their relationship to environmental variability. Journal of Shellfish Research, 33(2), 355-372.
23. Caill-Milly, N., Bru, N., Mahé, K., Borie, C.and D'Amico, F.2012. Shell shape analysis and spatial allometry patterns of Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in a mesotidal coastal lagoon. Journal of Marine Biology, 2012
24. Cerrato, R. M. and Keith, D. L.1992. Age structure, growth, and morphometric variations in the Atlantic surf clam, Spisula solidissima, from estuarine and inshore waters. Marine Biology, 114(4), 581-593.
25. Chapman, V. J.1984. Botanical surveys in mangrove communities. Monographs on oceanographic methodology, 8, 53-80.
26. Christo, S. W., Ivachuk, C. S., Ferreira-Júnior, A. L. and Absher, T. M. 2016. Reproductive periods of Lucina pectinata (BIVALVE; LUCINIDAE) in the Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, Paraná-Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, (AHEAD), 0-0.
27. Cigarria, J.and Fernández, J.1998. Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) culture in oyster bags: influence of density on survival, growth and biometric relationships. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 78(02), 551-560.
28. Claxton, W. T., Wilson, A. B., Mackie, G. L.and Boulding, E. G.1998. A genetic and morphological comparison of shallow-and deep-water populations of the introduced dreissenid bivalve Dreissena bugensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76(7), 1269-1276.
29. Combelles, S., Moreteau, J. C.,and Vicente, N.1986. Contribution a la connaissance de l'ecologie de Pinna nobilis L.(Mollusque eulamelibranche). Sci. Rep. Port--Cros Nat. Park, 12, 29-43.
30. Dechaseaux, C. 1952. Classe des lamellibranches (Lamellibranchiata Blainville 1816). In: J. Piveteau, ed., Traité de Paléontologie, Vol. 2. Masson, Paris. 220-364pp.
31. Derbali, A., Ghorbel, M.and Jarboui,O.2012. Etude comparative des caractères biométriques chez l'huitre perlière" Pinctada radiata" des iles de Kerkennah (sud tunisien).
32. Doty, T. W.2015. Environmental Controls on the Diversity and Distribution of Endosymbionts Associated with Phacoides pectinatus (Bivalvia: Lucinidae) from Shallow Mangrove and Seagrass Sediments, St. Lucie County, Florida.
33. Eagar, R. M. C., Stone, N. M.and Dickson, P. A. 1984 .Correlations between shape, weight and thickness of shell in four populations of Venerupis rhomboides (Pennant). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 50(1), 19-38.
34. Frenkiel, L., Gros, O. and Mouëza, M.1996. Gill structure in Lucina pectinata (Bivalvia: Lucinidae) with reference to hemoglobin in bivalves with symbiotic sulphur-oxidizing bacteria. Marine Biology, 125(3), 511-524.
35. Frenkiel,L.and Mouëza,M.,1985. Cycle de reproduction et déterminisme sexuel chez le Lucinidae Phacoıdes pectinatus (Gmelin, 1791) (Mollusque Lamellibranche). Proc. Gulf Carib. Fish Inst. 38, 252–259.
36. Fuiman, L. A., Gage, J. D.and Lamont, P. A.1999. Shell morphometry of the deep sea protobranch bivalve Ledella pustulosa in the Rockall Trough, north-east Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 79(04), 661-671.
37. Funk A. and Reckendorfer W. 2008. Environmental heterogeneity and morphological variability in Pisidium subtruncatum (Sphaeriidae, Bivalvia). Internat Rev Hydrobiol 93:188–199. doi: 10.1002/iroh.200710969
38. García-March, J. R., Pérez-Rojas, L.and García-Carrascosa, A. M. 2007.Influence of hydrodynamic forces on population structure of Pinna nobilis L., 1758 (Mollusca: Bivalvia): The critical combination of drag force, water depth, shell size and orientation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 342(2), 202-212.
39. Gaspar, M. B., Santos, M. N., Vasconcelos, P.and Monteiro, C. C.2002 .Shell morphometric relationships of the most common bivalve species (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). Hydrobiologia, 477(1-3), 73-80.
40. Gérard,1978 Recherches sur la variabilité de diverses populations de Ruditapes decussatus et Ruditapes philippinarum (Veneridae, Bivalvia) [Dissertation thesis], Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, 1978
41. Glover, E. A., Taylor, J. D.and Williams, S. T.2008. Mangrove associated lucinid bivalves of the central Indo-West Pacific: review of the “Austriella” group with a new genus and species (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Lucinidae). Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supplement, 18, 25-4.
42. Gordillo, S., Márquez, F., Cárdenas, J.and Zubimendi, M. Á. 2011.Shell variability in Taweragayi (Veneridae) from southern South America: a morphometric approach based on contour analysis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 91(04), 815-822.
43. Guelorget, O., Gaujous, D., Louis, M.and Perthuisot, J. P.1990. Macrobenthofauna of lagoons in Guadeloupean mangroves (Lesser Antilles): role and expressions of the confinement. Journal of Coastal Research, 611-626.
44. Hackney, C. T.1985. A note on the effects of abnormally low temperature on the Carolina marsh clam. Estuaries, 8(4), 394-395.
45. Holme, N. A.1961.Shell form in Venerupis rhomboides. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41(03), 705-722.
46. Holopainen, I. J., & Kuiper, J. G.;1982, Janu January).Notes on the morphometry and anatomy of some Pisidium and Sphaerium species (Bivalvia, Sphaeriidae).In AnnalesZoologiciFennici (pp. 93-107). Finnish Academy of Sciences, SocietasScientiarumFennica, Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica and SocietasBiologicaFennicaVanamo.
47. Huxley, J. S. 1924. Constant differential growth-ratios and their significance.Nature, 114(2877), 895-896.
48. Huxley, J. 1932. Problems of relative growth.
49. Hynd, J.S.1960. An analysis of variation in Australian specimens of Pinctada albina (Lamarck)(Lamellibranchia). Marine and Freshwater Research, 11(3), 326-364.
50. Jackson, J. B. C.1972. The ecology of the molluscs of Thalassia communities, Jamaica, West Indies. II. Molluscan population variability along an environmental stress gradient. Marine Biology, 14(4), 304-337.
51. Jarne, P., Berrebi, P. and Guelorget, O.1988.Variabilité génétique et morphométrique de cinq populations de la palourde Ruditapes decussatus (mollusque, bivalve). Oceanologica acta, 11(4), 401-407.
52. Joseph, P.2006. Hypothèses sur l’évolution de la végétation littorale des Petites Antilles depuis l'époque précolombienne: le cas de la Martinique.Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography.
53. Juanes, F. 1992. Why do decapod crustaceans prefer small-sized molluscan prey?. Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 87, 239-239.
54. Kakino, J. 1996. Relationship between growth of Japanese little neck clam Ruditapes philippinarum and current velocity on Banzu tidal flat, Tokyo Bay. Bull. Chiba Pref. Fish. Exp. Stn. (in Japanese, with English abstract) cité par Caill-Milly et al,2014.
55. Kim, Y. H., Ryu, D. K., Lee, D. W., Chang, D. S., Kim, J. B., Kim, S. T.and Kwon, D. H. 2006. Morphological Analysis among Populations of Purpulish Washington Clam, Saxidomus purpuratus on the Korean Waters. The Korean Journal of Malacology, 22(1), 23-26.
56. Krapivka, S., Toro, J. E., Alcapán, A. C., Astorga, M., Presa, P., Pérez, M.and Guiñez, R.2007. Shell‐shape variation along the latitudinal range of the Chilean blue mussel Mytiluschilensis (Hupe 1854). Aquaculture Research,38(16), 1770-1777.
57. Kraus, D. W.1995. Heme Proteins in Sulfide-oxidizing Bacteri/Mollusc Symbioses. American zoologist, 35(2), 112-120.
58. Kuiper, J. G. J.1949. Note préliminaire sur un Gastéropode terrestre énigmatique. Basteria, 13(1/3), 40-43.
59. Kwon, J. Y., Park, J. W., Lee, Y. H., Park, J. Y., Hong, Y. K.and Chang, Y. J.1999. Morphological variation and genetic relationship among populations of the shortnecked clam Ruditapes philippinarum collected from different habitats.Fisheries and aquaticsciences, 2(1), 98-104.
60. Laborel-Deguen, F.1984. Les herbiers de phanérogames marines de la Martinique. Rapport de Mission Corantilles Il.
61. Lafrance, M., Cliche, G., Haugum, G. A.and Guderley, H. 2003. Comparison of cultured and wild sea scallops Placopectenmagellanicus, using behavioral responses and morphometric and biochemical indices. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 250, 183-195
62. Legrand, H. 2010. Cartographie des biocénoses benthiques du littoral martiniquais et eutrophisation en zone récifale en relation avec les sources de pression d’origine anthropique (Doctoral dissertation, Thèse, Université des Antilles et de la Guyane).
63. Lin, J.1991. Predator-prey interactions between blue crabs and ribbed mussels living in clumps. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, 32, 61-69
64. Luttikhuizen, P. C., Drent, J., Van Delden, W.and Piersma, T. 2003. Spatially structured genetic variation in a broadcast spawning bivalve: quantitative vs. molecular traits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16(2), 260-272.
65. Mahadevan, S.1980. Taxonomy and ecology of cultivable molluscs.
66. Márquez, F.and Van Der Molen, S. 2011. Intraspecific shell-shape variation in the razor clam Ensis macha along the Patagonian coast. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 77(2), 123-128
67. Márquez, F., Robledo, J., Peñaloza, G. E.and Van der Molen, S. 2010. Use of different geometric morphometrics tools for the discrimination of phenotypic stocks of the striped clam Ameghinomya antiqua (Veneridae) in north Patagonia, Argentina. Fisheries research, 101(1), 127-131.
68. McLachlan, A., Jaramillo, E., Defeo, O., Dugan, J., de Ruyck, A.and Coetzee, P.1995. Adaptations of bivalves to different beach types. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 187(2), 147-160.
69. Micheli, F. 1995. Behavioural plasticity in prey-size selectivity of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus feeding on bivalve prey. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63-74.
70. Morais, P., Rufino, M. M., Reis, J., Dias, E.and Sousa, R. 2013. Assessing the morphological variability of Unio delphinus Spengler, 1783 (Bivalvia: Unionidae) using geometric morphometry. Journal of Molluscan Studies, eyt037.
71. Moreteau, J. C.and Vicente, N.1980. Etude morphologique et croissance de Pinna nobilis L. Mollusque Eulamelibranche) dans le parc national sous-marin de Port-Cros (Var-France). Vie Marine, 2, 52-58.
72. Neri, R., Schifano, G.and Papanicolaou, C. 1978.Effects of salinity on mineralogy and chemical composition of Cerastoderma edule and Monodonta articulata shells. Marine Geology, 30 : 233-241.
73. Newell, C. R.and Hidu, H.1982. The effects of sediment type on growth rate and shell allometry in the soft shelled clam Mya arenaria L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 65(3), 285-295.
74. Nogueira, E.M.S. and Freitas, L.M. 2002. Distribuição e aspectosbiológicos de Lucina pectinata (Gmelin, 1791) (Bivalvia-Lucinidae) na Lagoa Mundaú-Alagoas-Brasil. Tropical Oceanography, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 7-14.
75. Ohba, S.1959. Ecological studies in the natural population of a clam, Tapes japonica, with special reference to seasonal variations in the size and structure of the population and to individual growth. Biol. J. Okayama Univ, 5(1/2), 13-42. Cité par Caill-Milly and al,2012
76. Owen, g., 1953.'On the biology of Glossus humanus (L.) (Isocardiacor Lam.).' J. mar.biol. Ass. U.K., 32, 85.
77. Palmer, M., Pons, G. X.and Linde, M.2004. Discriminating between geographical groups of a Mediterranean commercial clam (Chamelea gallina (L.): Veneridae) by shape analysis. Fisheries Research, 67(1), 93-98.
78. Poggio, C. A. 2002. Biologia quantitativa de Lucina Pectinata (Gmelin, 1791)(Bivalvia—Lucinidae) no ecossistema de manguezal de Garapuá. Universidade Federal da Bahia. Monografia de Graduação.
79. Rajaei, M., Poorbagher, H., Farahmand, H., Mortazavi, M. S.and Eagderi, S. 2014. Interpopulation differences in shell forms of the pearl oyster, Pinctada imbricata radiata (Bivalvia: Pterioida), in the northern Persian Gulf inferred from principal component analysis and elliptic Fourier analysis. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 38(1), 42-48.
80. Rathier, I.1993. Le stock de Lambi (Strombus gigas, L.) en Martinique: analyse de la situation 1986-1987, modélisation de l'exploitation, options d'aménagement (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Bretagne Occidentale).
81. Reimer, O. and Harms-Ringdahl S. 2001. Predator-inducible changes in blue mussels from the predator-free Baltic Sea. Mar Biol 139:959–965
82. Reimer, O. and Tedengren M. 1996. Phenotypical improvement of morphological defences in the mussel Mytilus edulis induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens. Oikos 75:383–390
83. Ricker, W. E.1973. Linear regressions in fishery research. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada, 30(3), 409-434.
84. Rondinelli, S. F.and Barros, F. 2010. Evaluating shellfish gathering (Lucina pectinata) in a tropical mangrove system. Journal of Sea Research, 64(3), 401-407.
85. Rufino, M. M., Vasconcelos, P., Pereira, F., Fernández-Tajes, J., Darriba, S., Méndez, J.and Gaspar, M. B. 2013. Geographical variation in shell shape of the pod razor shell Ensis siliqua (Bivalvia: Pharidae). Helgoland Marine Research, 67(1), 49-58.
86. Sälgeback, J. 2006. Functional morphology of gastropods and bivalves.
87. Seed, R.1968. Factors Influencing Shell Shape in the Mussel Mytilus Edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, pp 561-584.
88. Seed, R.and Hughes, R. N.1995. Criteria for prey size-selection in molluscivorous crabs with contrasting claw morphologies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 193(1), 177-195.
89. Selin, N. I. 2007. Shell form, growth and life span of Astarte arctica and A. borealis (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the subtidal zone of northeastern Sakhalin. Russian Journal of Marine Biology, 33(4), 232-237.
90. Signorelli, J. H., Márquez, F. and Pastorino, G.2013. Phenotypic variation of south-western Atlantic clam Mactra isabelleana (Bivalvia: Mactridae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 93(02), 511-517.
91. Smith A.H., Rogers C.and Bouchon C. 1996. Status of Western Atlantic Coral reefs in the Lesser Antilles. Proceedings of Eighth International Coral Reef Symposium (Panama City, 1997) 1 : 351-356.
92. Sokal, R. R.and Rohlf, F. J.1987; Biostatistics. Francise& Co, New York.
93. Sousa, R., Freire, R., Rufino, M., Méndez, J., Gaspar, M., Antunes, C.and Guilhermino, L. 2007 Genetic and shell morphological variability of the invasive bivalve Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) in two Portuguese estuaries.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 74(1), 166-174.
94. Stanley, S. M.1970. Relation of shell form to life habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca) (Vol. 125). Geological Society of America.
95. Steffani, C.and Branch G.2003. Growth rate, condition, and shell shape of Mytilus galloprovincialis: responses to wave exposure. Mar EcolProgSer 246:197–209
96. Stirling, H. P.and OkumuÅŸ, Ä°. 1994. Growth, mortality and shell morphology of cultivated mussel (Mytilus edulis) stocks cross-planted between two Scottish sea lochs. Marine Biology, 119(1), 115-123
97. Tallqvist, M.2001. Burrowing behaviour of the Baltic clam Macoma balthica: effects of sediment type, hypoxia and predator presence. Marine Ecology Progress Series
98. Taylor, J. D.and Glover, E. A. 2000. Functional anatomy, chemosymbiosis and evolution of the Lucinidae. Geological Society, London, Special Publications,177(1), 207-225.
99. Tokeshi M, Ota N, Kawai T. 2000. A comparative study of morphometry in shell-bearing mollusks. Journal of Zoology 251 31-38.
100. Valladares, A., Manríquez, G.and Suárez-Isla, B. A.2010. Shell shape variation in populations of Mytilus chilensis (Hupe 1854) from southern Chile: a geometric morphometric approach. Marine biology, 157(12), 2731-2738.
101. Wada, K. T.1986. Genetic selection for shell traits in the Japanese pearl oyster, Pinctada fucata martensii. Aquaculture, 57(1), 171-176.
102. Warmke, G. L.and Abbott, R. T. 1962. Caribbean seashells. A guide to the marine mollusks of Puerto Rico and other West Indian Islands, Bermuda and the Lower Florida Keys.
103. Watanabe, S.and Katayama, S. 2010. Relationships among shell shape, shell growth rate, and nutritional condition in the Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in Japan. Journal of Shellfish Research, 29(2), 353-359
How to Cite
MODESTIN, emma. (2017). Morphological variations of the shell of the bivalve Lucina pectinata (Gmelin, 1791). JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN BIOLOGY, 10(2), 2092-2107.