Exploring the Relationships Among Innovation, Collaboration, and School Change in a Mixed Methods
Continuous school improvement efforts require schools to prepare, organize, and lead change. This study examined how a school created a context for change by implementing an innovation to improve teaching practices, school culture, and student learning outcomes. Implementing innovation requires school leaders to understand the process of change to successfully sustain school improvement efforts. The purpose of this research study was to assess the effectiveness that an innovative hybrid schedule had on improving student learning outcomes and school culture. This mixed-method research study used data generated by the AdvancEdÂ®â€™s Stakeholder Feedback Survey, the ACT AspireÂ® Student Achievement Tests, and teacher interviews.
The analysis of this studyâ€™s data indicated several factors that facilitated change through the implementation of the innovative hybrid schedule. The researcher discovered these overall factors related to the benefits of students changing classes, teachers becoming content specialists, collaboration through PLCs and vertical planning. Additionally, the results revealed that significant change occurred in school culture based on the AdvancEdÂ®â€™s Stakeholder Feedback Survey. Additionally, student learning outcomes measured by ACT AspireÂ® Reading and Mathematics Student Achievement Tests showed a statistically significant improvement in both reading and math.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2010). Reframing the path to school leadership, a guide for teachers and principals. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.
Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19, 3â€“13.
Danielson, C. (2003). Enhancing student achievement: A framework for school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1047â€“1085.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
DuFour, R. (2004, May). What is a â€œprofessional learning communityâ€? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6â€“11.
Dufour, DuFour, and Eaker. Revisiting professional learning communities at work: new insights for improving schools, Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press, 2008.
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50, 12â€“12.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change, 4th edition. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M., Hord, S. M., & Frank, V. V. (2015). Reach the highest standard in professional learning: implementation. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Pearson.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2011). Implementing change: patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Pearson.
Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change tver Time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly,42(1), 3-41. doi:10.1177/0013161x05277975
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (n.d.). The fourth way. Educational Leadership: Context, Strategy and Collaboration, 283-289. doi:10.4135/9781473915244.n21
Hinde, E. R. (2004). School culture and change: An examination of the effects of school culture on the process of change. Essays in Education, 11.
Hord, S. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. Learning Together, Leading Together: Changing Schools through Professional Learning Communities, 5â€“14.
Hord, S. M., & Roussin, J. L. (2013). Implementing change through learning: Concerns-based concepts, tools, and strategies for guiding change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. J. (2002). Leadership challenge (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
National Governors Association, Council of Chief State School Officers, and Achieve, Inc. (2008). Benchmarking for success: ensuring u.s. students receive a world class education. Washington, DC: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Common core state standards initiative: preparing americaâ€™s students for college and career. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org
Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103â€“116. Doi: 103102/0013189X11405038
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
Rothkopf, E. Z. (2009). An immodest proposal: Pedagogic information supports for teachers. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 164â€“179.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Why we should seek substitutes for leadership. Educational Leadership. 5 .41 - 45.
Stoll, L. (2009). Connecting learning communities: Capacity building for systemic change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 469-484). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer International.
Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wehlage, A., & Newman, F. (1993). The ten commandments of business and how to break them By Bill Fromm. Performance Instruction,32(5), 24-24. doi:10.1002/pfi.4170320511
Copyright (c) 2018 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION METHODOLOGY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.