Technological Approaches in Applied Social learning
(Formulate in lieu of industry 4.0)
Industry 4.0 covers the readiness of achieving expertise that impacts the society, strategy, talent and technology. Individual, social and economic demands pose ever-changing challenges for education and training even in today’s world. In spite of the shrinking rapidity, which progressively affects the cognitive, biological, and information offerings into the new insights on people learning, for an effective reformation to an even more miniature of scientific and technological connect, ultimately on the knowledge content. Today’s students will compete in a technological, diverse, multi-cultural world and must be prepared to thrive in that futuristic environment; therefore, it is vital that today’s pedagogy produce lifelong learners, who can succeed in a global arena. To ensure our educational technology progresses at the rate demanded by today’s ubiquitous digital learners, we are reviewing emerging technologies and traditional teaching methods and propose desirable changes. Further enhancement in student learning and outcomes through technology enabled learning builds alliances among institutional units, employers, community partners and provides the effective delivery of learning services and opportunities to students. Technology depends on the cleverness and the innovative application of theoretical tools from control and estimation for scalability through hierarchy and multi-modality. Educational technology enhances the learning experience for students, faculty, the university and community at large. Hence, to develop a richer context for student learning, covering societal inadequacies, injustices in empowerment to learning access among students, cross-cultural involvements, and opportunity to learn, we deliberate on the latest trends in pedagogy - intelligent tutoring systems and ICT integration that can be modified during their implementation to suit future needs for industry 4.0 requirements.
2. Alam, F., Mehmood, R., Katib, I., Albogami, N. N., & Albeshri, A. (2017). Data Fusion and IoT for Smart Ubiquitous Environments: A Survey. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2697839
3. Aleven, V., & Sewall, J. (2010). Workshop?: Hands-on Introduction to Creating Intelligent Tutoring Systems without Programming using the Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT). Icls 2010, 2, 511–512.
4. Antonella Pasqualone., (2017), Flat breads: origin, diffusion and baking methods. New ideas for the market of ethnic, traditional or gluten free breads, TECNICA MOLITORIA, Vol 68., No7, pp.522-540.
5. Bowen, J. A., & Watson, C. E. (2017). Teaching naked techniques: A practical guide for designing better classrooms, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. San Francisco, CA.
6. Chamberlin, L., & Lehmann, K. (2011). Twitter in higher education. … Technologies in Higher Education, (June), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000001021
7. Daniel Buhr (2017), Social Innovation Policy for Industry 4.0, A PROJECT BY THE FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG2015 AND 2017pp.24.
8. Dickson Adom, Krishnan Umachandran, Daniel Boamah Asante, Parisa Ziarati, Barbara Sawicka., (2019), The Concept, State, Roles and Management of Protected Areas in Ghana: A Review, ACTA SCIENTIFIC AGRICULTURE (ISSN: 2581-365X), Vol 3 Issue 1, pp.68-76
9. Elena D?nescu.,(2015), Intercultural Education from the Perspective of Training Didactic Competences, The 6th International Conference Edu World 2014 “Education Facing Contemporary World Issues”, 7th - 9th November 2014, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180 (2015) 537 – 542, ScienceDirect1877-0428, doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.156
10. Ferdinand-James. (2017). Asynchronous Debates - Contribution to Chapter 10. In J. A. Bowen & E. C. Watson (Eds.), Teaching Naked Techniques: A Practical Guide to Designing Better Classes (1st ed., p. 154). San Francisco, CA.
11. Ferdinand-James, D., & Umachandran, K. (2016). Online Assessment: Product development in academic writing. Maha Journal of Education, 2(1), 73–78.
12. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for Culturally Responsive Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003
13. Geisinger, B., N., I., & Raman, D. R. (2013). Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 914–925.
14. Greenhow, C. (2011). Online social networks and learning. On the Horizon, 19(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111107663
15. Hafkin, N. J., & Huyer, S. (2008). Women and Gender in ICT Statistics and Indicators for Development. Information Technologies and International Development, 4(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/itid.2008.00006
16. Hogan, R. (2011). Blended Learning across Disciplines. Blended Learning across Disciplines: Models for Implementation. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-479-0
17. Hong, C. M., Chen, C. M., Chang, M. H., & Chen, S. C. (2007). Intelligent web-based tutoring system with personalized learning path guidance. In Proceedings - The 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2007 (pp. 512–516). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2007.167
18. Helen Soule et al., (2015), Building Your Roadmap to 21st Century Learning Environments, A planning tool for education leaders, pp.195, https://www.roadmap21.org/assets/Creating-Your-Roadmap-to-21st-Century-Learning-Environments1.pdf
19. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:8060645
20. Jossey-Bass.Cavus, N., & Alhih, M. S. (2014). Learning Management Systems Use in Science Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 517–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.429.
21. Khan, B. (2010). The Global e-Learning Framework. Stride Handbook 8. Retrieved from http://technologysource.org/article/336/
22. Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S. J., Cunningham, K., & Skogsholm, A. (2010). A Data Repository for the EDM community?: The PSLC DataShop. Handbook of Educational Data Mining, 43–55. https://doi.org/doi:10.1201/b10274-6
23. Krishnan Umachandran, Debra Sharon Ferdinand (2017), Affordances of Data Science in Agriculture, Manufacturing, and Education, Book - Privacy and Security Policies in Big Data, Edition: 1, Publisher: IGL Global, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2486-1.ch002.
24. Krishnan Umachandran (2017),Technology in Business education, (Learning Applications - Assignment Submissions in YouTube), 27th International Conference on Teaching, Education and Learning (ICTEL), 15-16 Nov 2017, Kuala Lumpur.
25. Krishnan Umachandran, P. Amuthalakshmi, (2017), Interpersonal relationships at workplace, Splint International Journal of Professionals, ISSN 23496045, Vol IV, Issue 6, June 2017.
26. Mundy Meghan., Eyler, Janet., (2002), Service-Learning and Retention: Promising Possibilities, Potential Partnerships. Vanderbilt University. 2002.
27. Parisa Ziarati, Krishnan Umachandran, Dickson Adom, Mohamed A. El-Esawi, Barbara Sawicka (2018), Fluoridex Daily Defense Toothpaste for Oral and Dental Health: A Review, J Med Discov (2018);3(3):jmd18034; DOI:10.24262/jmd.3.3.18034
28. Qingsong, L. (2012). The Application of Multimedia Technology in Web Education. Physics Procedia, 33, 1553–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.252
29. Saettler, P. (1988). History of Educational Technology. The Encyclopaedia of Educational Media Communications and Technology.
30. Shirazi, F., Gholami, R., & Añón Higón, D. (2009). The impact of information and communication technology (ICT), education and regulation on economic freedom in Islamic Middle Eastern countries. Information & Management, 46(8), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.08.003
31. Soon-Jo Chung., Aditya Paranjape., Philip Dames., Shaojie Shen., Vijay Kumar., (2019),
A Survey on Aerial Swarm Robotics, pp.19. https://authors.library.caltech.edu/87925/1/tro-aerial-robotics_final.pdf.
32. Talebian, S., Mohammadi, H. M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Higher Education: Advantages, Disadvantages, Conveniences and Limitations of Applying E-learning to Agricultural Students in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.199
33. T. Roosefert Mohan., (2019), Zero Down Time Approach in Smart Factory, Doctoral Committee presentation, SRM University
34. UNESCO., (2013), Lifelong Learning, UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning, Technical Note, pp.10.
35. Turing A. M., (1950),Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 49, pp. 433-460, https://www.csee.umbc.edu/courses/471/papers/turing.pdf
Copyright (c) 2019 Krishnan Umachandran, Amuthalakshmi P, Roosefert Mohan T
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.