The Analysis on the Key Factors of Fire Rescue Course Content Design – A Case Study of Miaoli County

  • Hung-Teng Chang Assis Prof., Department of Information Management, Yu Da University of Science and Technology
  • Chih-Yao Lo Prof., Department of Health and Creative Vegetarian Science ,Fo Guang University
  • Wen-Chia kevin Tu No.7, Ln. 168, Nantian St., Toufen City, Miaoli County 351, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Keywords: fire rescue and training, analytic hierarchy process, Delphi method


This study discussed the factors affecting the design of the fire rescue and training courses for firefighters in Miaoli County. A questionnaire survey was conducted on firefighters. The content of the fire rescue courses held by Miaoli County Fire Bureau was discussed. Based on literature review and expert opinions upon Delphi method, this study analyzed the indicators of influencing factors. A hierarchical architecture was established. The weights affecting the design factor indicators affecting the fire rescue courses were obtained with the survey and analytic hierarchy process, and then were summarized and analyzed to establish a weight system.


[1] Ho, C.I., Discussion about the intensity of fire rescue training in Miaoli County, Graduate Institute of Information Management, 2016.
[2] Lee, C.T., Study on the All-year-round Education and Training of Professional Police in Taiwan--Taking the Police Brigade of National Park as an Example. Master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, 2005.
[3] Lin, C.H., “A Study on Training and Demands of Firefighters Education-A Survey in Taitung County” Master’s thesis, Educational Administration of the Learning Department of National Taitung University, 2009.
[4] Yeh, C.C., Weng, S.L., Wu, J.H., “A Study Comparing the Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method”, Survey study-Method and Application, Center for Survey study, s, Academia Sinica, (21), April, 2007.
[5] Duffield, C. (1988). The Delphi Technique. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing,
[6] Dunn, W. N., (1993). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (2nd Ed), NewJersey: Prentice Dubois, D. and H pard.
[7] Goldstein, I.L(1986). Training in Orgnizations:Need Assessment,Development and Evaluation (2nd ed.),Calif.:Wadsworth.
[8] Hill, K. Q., & Fowles, J. (1975). The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 7, 179-192.
[9] Linstone, H.A. (1978). The Delphi Method.In J.Fowless (ED.), Hand-book of Futures Research, Londen: greenwood Press, PP.273-300.
[10] Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method:Techniques and applications.New York, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[11] Lanford, H.W. (1972). Technological foreacstinf methodologies:A synthesis. NY:American Management Association, Inc.
[12] Martino, J.P.(1972).Technological Forecasting For Decision-Marking New York:American Elsevuer.Saaty,Thomas L.
[13] Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436.
[14] Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forcasting tool: Issues and analysis.International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353-375.
[15] Stewart, T. R. (1987). The Delphi technique and judgmental forecasting. Climatic Change, 11, 97-113.
[16] Saaty, T. L.(1990).The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.
[17]Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill, USA.
[18]Saaty, T. L. & Vargas, L. G. (1984). The Ligimacy of Rank Reversal, OMEGA, 12(5), pp. 513-516.