SIMULATION AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS FSR AND ZRP IN VEHICULAR AD-HOC NETWORK (VANET)

  • Putri Annisa Septianti School Of Electrical Engineering Telkom University Bandung
  • Rendy Munandi School Of Electrical Enginnering Telkom University Bandung
  • Ridha Muldina Negara School Of Electrical Engineering Telkom University Bandung
Keywords: VANET, NS-2, FSR, ZRP, SUMO

Abstract

Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network (VANET) is a wireless routing network which used ad hoc network system as the basis. VANET was formed to give solution to the unclear network infrastructure or frequently changing network topology. The change of speed and the nodes amount in an area influenced the overhead level in sending message and end to end delay with low packet loss. The right routing protocol selection has an important role in guarantee the Quality of Service in VANET which needs low delay and overhead. This study analyzed the Fisheye State Routing (FSR) protocol performance as a proactive routing protocol that renew the table routing in certain period and Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) as a hybrid protocol that uses zone and hop distant to decide the table routing renewal in sending data with Cisco codec G 711 standard in highway areas using NS-2.31 and NS-2.35 and traffic simulator SUMO 0.12.3. Moreover, the measured metrics performances were Average end-to-end delay, Normalized Routing Load, Average Throughput, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and Routing Overhead.

References

[1] Anuj K. Gupta, Harsh Sadawarti and Anil K. Verma “Implementation Of DYMO Routing Protocol” International
Journal of Information Technology, Modeling and Computing (IJITMC) Vol.1, No.2, May 2013.
[2] Dhankhar, Shilpi,.ShilpyAgrawal. VANETs: A Survey on Routing Protocols and Issues.International Journal of
Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. Vol. 3, Issue 6, June 2014
[3] Beijar , Nicklas. 2015. Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP). Networking Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology
Finlandia.
[4] J. Munera, J. M. de Fuentes, A. I. González-Tablas. Towards a comparable evaluation for VANET protocols: NS-2
experiments builder assistant and extensible test bed.
[5] Jaap, Sven,. Marc Bechler, Lars Wolf. Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks in Typical
Road Traffic Scenarios.Institute of Operating Systems and Computer Networks.
[6] Kamini and Rakesh Kumar. “VANET Parameters and Application: A Review”. Global Journal of Computer Science
and Technology, Volume 10, Issue 7, 2010.
[7] Karagiannis, G., Altintas, O., Ekici, E., Heijenk, G., Jarupan, B., Lin, K., and Weil, T., “Vehicular Networking: A
Survey and Tutorial on Requirements, Architectures, Challenges, Standards and Solutions”, IEEE Communications
Surveys & Tutorials, Vol.13, No.4, Fourth Quarter 2011.
[8] Khairnar, V. D. danKotecha, K.. 2013. Performance of Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication using IEEE 802.11p in
Vehicular Ad-hoc Network Environment. International Journal of Network Security and Its Applications, Vol.5,
No.2, 143-170
[9] ntmckorlantaspolri.blogspot.com/2012/01/undang-undang-nomor-22-tahun-2009-pasal.html. Undang-UndangNomor
22 Tahun 2009, Pasal 287 ayat 5 Tentang Batas KecepatanKendaraan. diaksestanggal 14 September 2015
[10] Suthaputchakun, C., and Sun, Z., “Routing Protocol in Inter-vehicle Communication Systems: A Survey”, IEEE
Communications Magazine, December 2011.
[11] Singh, Abhishek. Simulation and Analysis of AODV, DSDV, ZRP in VANETs .2013. Computer Science And
Engineering Department Thapar University
Published
2016-08-30
How to Cite
Septianti, P. A., Munandi, R., & Negara, R. M. (2016). SIMULATION AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS FSR AND ZRP IN VEHICULAR AD-HOC NETWORK (VANET). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY, 15(6), 6796-6805. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v15i6.3975
Section
Articles