This procedure applies to complaints about the policies, procedures, or actions of the CIRWORLD Journal’s editorial staff. We welcome complaints as they provide an opportunity and a spur for improvement, and we aim to respond quickly, courteously, and constructively. Please write your complaint with journal title, vol. no., issue no., paper ID, paper title, page no.
Our definition of a complaint is as follows:
Ø The complainant defines his or her expression of unhappiness as a complaint.
Ø We infer that the complainant is not simply disagreeing with a decision we have made or something we have published (which happens every day) but thinks that there has been a failure of process – for example, a long delay or a rude response – or a severe misjudgment.
Ø The complaint must be about something that is within the responsibility of the CIRWORLD – content or process.CIRWORLD aware of the complaints stated below:
1) Authorship complaints
2) Plagiarism complaints
3) Multiple, duplicate, concurrent publication/Simultaneous submission
4) Research results misappropriation
5) Allegations of research errors and fraud
6) Research standards violations
7) Undisclosed conflicts of interest
8) Reviewer bias or competitive harmful acts by reviewers Policy for Handling Complaints
If the Journal receives a complaint that any contribution to the Journal infringes copyright or other intellectual property rights or contains material inaccuracies,
libelous materials or otherwise unlawful materials, the Journal will investigate the complaint.
Investigation may include a request that the parties involved substantiate their claims.
The Journal will make a good faith determination whether to remove the allegedly wrongful material.
A decision not to remove material should represent the Journal’s belief that the complaintis without sufficient foundation, or if well‐founded, that a legal defense or
exemption may apply, such as fair use in the case of copyright infringement or truthfulness of a statement in the case of libel.
Journal should document its investigation and decision.
We strive to ensure that all of CIRWORLD are of the highest quality and are free from errors.
However, we accept that occasionally mistakes might happen.
If you have a complaint with our editorial or your subscription, please follow the links below.Editorial Complaints Policy
The Managing Editor and staff of CIRWORLD will make every endeavour to put matters right as soon as possible in the most appropriate way, offering right of reply where necessary. As far as possible, we will investigate complaints in a blame-free manner, looking to see how systems can be improved to prevent mistakes occurring.Guiding Principles
Our general approach to complaints is that they are a rare but inevitable part of a process that involves putting together complex material at great speed. We accept that we make mistakes and try to treat all complaints with urgency, however small. We believe that timely solutions can prevent problems escalating. All substantial errors and complaints are referred to senior managers within the company as a matter of course.
How to make a complaint?
The procedure outlined below aims to be fair to those making complaints and those complained about.
All complaints will be acknowledged (within three working days if by email).
If possible a definitive response will be made within two weeks. If this is not possible an interim response will be given within two weeks. Interim responses will be provided until the complaint is finally resolved.
If the complainant remains unhappy, complaints should be escalated to the editor, whose decision is final.
What to do
Complaints about editorial content should be made as soon as possible after publication, preferably in writing by email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Or if you wish to email one of our specialist journals: email@example.com
CIRWORLD contain a number of double-blind peer-reviewed articles. Our publication ethics and publication malpractice statement is mainly based on the Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11 provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), an organisation covering academic journals. It will investigate complaints that members have not followed the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors.
COPE charts of authorship complaints
Corresponding author requests addition of extra author before publication
Corresponding author requests removal of author before publication
Request for addition of extra author after publication
Request for removal of author after publication
Suspected guest, ghost or gift authorship
Advice on how to spot authorship problems