A JUDICIAL APPRAISAL ON THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD STANDARD WITH REGARD TO CUSTODY AND ACCESS DECISIONS ON DIVORCE: A CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTAL IMPRINT

  • Dr Nico P Swartz Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law, University of Botswana

Abstract

This paper does not cover all aspects of court decisions about the interests of the child. It is confined to only the best interest of the child with regard to custody decisions on divorce in Botswana jurisdictions with an imprint of South African law dynamics. Everyone that is involved in the operation of an understanding of the child’s situation will benefit from what is going to be discussed in this paper. This study, however, actuates much more research into the questions of the best interests of the child. The research purports the acquisition of knowledge necessary to map out the best interests of the child standard. It does so by stressing the obsolete nature and dysfunctional practice of relics of Roman-Dutch and English common law. The study paves a new direction for determination purposes of the best interests of the child in line with constitutional imperatives or values. The research drawn the theoretical modalities from other jurisdictions, but in its practical application it resort to the Botswana judicature. Case laws of Botswana in which a constitutional imprint could be detected are, for example, Ndlovu v Macheme and Mokoti v Okatswa to name but a few. The stage is set firmly now for the protection and upholding of the best interests of the child along constitutional lines.

References

1. Adelene Africa et al. Chapter 6. Criteria used by Family Counsellors in Child Custody Cases. A Psychological Viewpoint. In: Burman Sandra et al (Ed.). 2003. The Fate of the Child. Legal Decisions on Children in the New South Africa. First Edition. Juta Law, Lansdowne, Cape Town.
2. Adoption of Children Act (Cap 28:01).
3. African Charter (1990). OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/24.9/49, Monrovia, Libia.
4. Amanda Barratt. Chapter 7. The Best Interests of the Child – Where is the Child’s Voice? In: Burman Sandra et al (Ed.). 2003. The Fate of the Child. Legal Decisions on Children in the New South Africa. First Edition. Juta Law, Lansdowne, Cape Town.
5. Attorney General v Dow (2001) AHRLR 99 (BwCA 1992).
6. Burman Sandra, Carmel Matthias et al (Ed.) Introductory Chapter: Beyond the Rights of the Child. In: Burman Sandra et al (Ed.). 2003. The Fate of the Child. Legal Decisions on Children in the New South Africa. First Edition. Juta Law, Lansdowne, Cape Town.
7. Caban v Mohammed 441 U.S. 380 (1979).
8. Constitution of the Republic of Botswana (1966).
9. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1995).
10. Cook v Cook 1937 AD 154.
11. Children’s Act (1960).
12. Children Act (2009) (No. 8 of 2009).
13. Child Care Act 74 of 1983.
14. Currie, Ian & De Waal, Johan. 2005. The Bill of Rights Handbook. Fifth Edition. Juta and Company Ltd, Lansdowne.
15. Davids v Davids 1914 WR 142.
16. Dhanabakium v Subramaniam 1943 AD.
17. Dumisani Ndlovu v Letsile Macheme [2008] 3 BLR 230 (HC).
18. Fletcher v Fletcher 1948 (1) SA 130 AD.
19. French v French 1971 (4) SA 298 (W).
20. Geofrey Khwarae v The Attorney General MAHGB-000291-14.
21. Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Act 72 of 1996.
22. Henderson, Patricia C. Chapter 1: Questions on Fostering. An Anthropologist’s Perspective. In: Burman Sandra et al (Ed.). 2003. The Fate of the Child. Legal Decisions on Children in the New South Africa. First Edition. Juta Law, Lansdowne, Cape Town.
23. http://www.elaws.gov.bw/lrfrm.php?words=Enter+a+keyword&x=21&y=13&tab=2&chk1=checkbox Accessed 21/03/2017 (page 1 of 3).
24. http://elaws.gov.bw.desplaylrpage.php?id=3488&dsp=2. Accessed 22/03/2017.
25. http://elaws.gov.bw/desplaylrpage.php?id=4592&dsp=2. Access 21/03/2017.
26. Lehr v Robertson 463 US 248 (Supreme Court, 1983).
27. Macheme v Ndlovu [2009] 1 BLR 120 (CA).
28. Mazile v Mazile 2001 (1) BLR 175 (HC).
29. Matrimonial Affairs Act 37 of 1953.
30. McCall v McCall 1994 (3) SA 201 (C ).
31. Mfundisi v Kabelo 2003 (2) BLR 129 (HC).
32. Modisenyane v Modisenyane 2006 (2) BLR 65 (HC).
33. Mokoti v Okatswa 2011 (2) BLR 1021 (HC).
34. Muyle v Mmutle 2007 (3) BLR 81 (HC).
35. Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act (Act 24 of 1987).
36. National Children’s Rights Committee (NCRC), 1994.
37. OAU Charter on the Rights of the Child. OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/24.9/49 (1990).
38. Office of the Family Advocate (1990).
39. Phibion v Phibion 2000 (1) BLR 195 (HC).
40. South African Constitution, Act 108 of 1996.
41. Stahl PM. 1994. Conducting Child Custody Evaluations: A Comprehensive Guide. Thousand Oaks. California. Sage Publications. In: Adelene Africa et al. Chapter 6. Criteria used by Family Counsellors in Child Custody Cases. A Psychological Viewpoint. In: Burman Sandra et al (Ed.). 2003. The Fate of the Child. Legal Decisions on Children in the New South Africa. First Edition. Juta Law, Lansdowne, Cape Town.
42. Stanley v Illinois 405 U.S. 645, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 31 L. Ed 2d 551, 1972 U.S.
43. T v M 1997 (1) SA 54 (A).
44. The United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC). OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/24.9/49 (1999).
45. United Nations Convention (1989). Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989, New York.
46. Wright, Ruth Ann. 2009. The Best-Interest of the Child Variables in Custody Evaluations and their Usefulness to the Decision-Making of Custody Evaluators, Litigants, and Judges. A Dissertation submitted to Fielding Graduate University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology. Pro Quest LLC, Parkway, United States.
47. Zaal, Noel. Chapter 8. Hearing the Voices of Children in Court. A Field Study and Evaluation. In: Burman Sandra et al (Ed.). 2003. The Fate of the Child. Legal Decisions on Children in the New South Africa. First Edition. Juta Law, Lansdowne, Cape Town.
Published
2017-06-30
How to Cite
SWARTZ, Dr Nico P. A JUDICIAL APPRAISAL ON THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD STANDARD WITH REGARD TO CUSTODY AND ACCESS DECISIONS ON DIVORCE: A CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTAL IMPRINT. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 2401-2414, june 2017. ISSN 2321-1091. Available at: <http://cirworld.com/index.php/jssr/article/view/6137>. Date accessed: 23 oct. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v11i2.6137.
Section
Articles