A Study of Gender Discourse in Zoya Pirzad Novels

  • Dr. Foroogh Kazemi Department of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
  • Shohreh Dalaee Department of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis, Gender discourse, Power, Ideology, Persuasion, Zoya Pirzad’s 2 Novels

Abstract

In this article, two novels by Zoya Pirzad has been investigated considering Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis. This article is trying to show how ideology and power of male-characters have influenced on female-characters in these novels. This paper shows that male’s patriarchal dialogues that are influenced by society, law and ideology put female characters in challenge and pushes aside their dialogues. This paper has investigated the influence of tradition, culture, and ideology on family life and particularly on people’s linguistic interactions from gender point of view. It has been found that the dominant discourse is patriarchal and most of novel females are passive. The research method in this article is analytical and analysis unit is sentences and dialogues of Zoya Pirzad’s  two novels.

References

1. Bloor, M. and Bloor, T. (2007). The Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis An Introduction, Oxford University Press Inc.
2. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987).Politeness: Some Universal in Language.
3. Brown, R. Gilman A. (1972). The Pronoun of Power and Solidarity. Laver and Hutcheson.
4. Cansler, D. C. and Stiles, W. B. (1981). “Relative Statue and interpersonal Presumptuousness.” Journal of Experiment of Social Psychology 17, pp. 459 Ed 441.
5. Fairclough, N. (1995) Media Discourse. Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Westly.
6. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power, Longman (Second revised edition 2007).
7. Kazemi, F. and Alizadeh Monir, M. (2016); “Critical Discourse Analysis in the Script of the Film “Gold and Copper” based on Laclau & Mouffe’s Approach”; Papers of the 3rd International Conference of Applied Articles in Language Teaching”; University of Tehran.
8. Kazemi, F. and Rowshanaiefard, A. (2016); “Semantic Disputes in Discourses, with an Overview of the Film Unwanted Wife”; Tehran; Arvan Press.
9. Kazemi, F. and Salmani Siah Balash, A. (2015) “Review of Function of Analysis Levels in Critical Approach to Discourse Analysis – Case Study: The Film “A Separation”; Scientific Journal of Linguistic Researches of Tarbiat Modarres University.
10. Kolb, D. M. and Putnam, L. L. (1997). Through the Looking Glass: Negotiation Theory Refracted Through the Lens of Gender. In S. E. Gleason (Ed.), Work Place Dispute Resolution: Directions for the 21st Century (PP. 231 – 257). East Lansing, MI: Michigon State University Press.
11. Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.
Published
2017-04-19
Section
Articles