Tunisian Democratic Transition : Dynamics of Conflict and Reconciliation

  • Rafaa Chehoudi

Abstract

This research examines Tunisian democratic transition and underlines the extent to which Tunisian political elite engaged in a democratic political practice. The Tunisian revolution, often referred to as the “Jasmine Revolution”, offered a great opportunity to leave behind a gloomy past tainted by long years of despotism and to lay the foundations of popular, representative and direct governance deeply rooted in people desire for freedom and justice. Accordingly, the research will first analyze the new political landscape and the major political powers contributing to the unfolding democratic transition. Second, the relationship between these actors will be underlined by discussing their approaches to democracy and their willingness to inaugurate a stable and sustained democracy that fits with a unique Tunisian model.

References

1. Allani, A. 2009. ‘The Islamists in Tunisia between Confrontation and Participation’, Journal of North African Studies, 14(2):257-272.
2. Anderson, L. 2001. ‘Arab Democracy: Dismal Prospects’, World Policy Journal, 18(3): 53-60.
3. Bitros, G., and Karayiannis, A. 2013. Creative Crisis in Democracy and Economy. New York: Springer.
4. Carothers, T. 2002. ‘The End of The Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13(1): 5-21.
5. Dahl, R. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University.
6. Dankwart, R.1970. ‘Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model’, Journla of Comparative Politics, 3(2):337-363.
7. Diamond, L. 2015. ‘Facing up to the Democratic Recession’, Journal of Democracy, 26(1): 141-155.
8. Feuer, S. 2012. ‘Islam and Democracy in Practice: Tunisia’s Ennahda Nine Months in’, Middle East Brief, 66.
9. Huntington, S .1991. ‘Democracy’s Third Wave’, Journal of Democracy, 2(2): 11-34.
10. Kubicel, P .2015. Political Islam and Democracy in the Muslim World. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.
11. Lenski, G.1966. Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.
12. Lipset, M.1959. ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, The American Political Science Review, 53(1):69-105.
13. Loudan, S .2015. ‘Political Islamism in Tunisia: A history of Repression and Complex Forum for Political Change’, Mathal, 4(1).
14. Ober, J.1993. Nomodeiktes: Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
15. O’Donnell, G., and Schmitter, P. 1986.Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Papagianni, K .2014. ‘Civil Society Dialogue Network’, National Dialogue Processes in Political Transitions, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, Geneva.
17. Salvatore, A .2000. Islam and the Political Discourse of Modernity. New York: Ithaca Press.
18. Setӓlӓ,M., and Schiller,T. 2009. Referendums and Representative Democracy: Responsiveness, Accountability and Deliberation.Routledge: ECPR studies in European Political Science.
19. Shakman, E .2007. ‘Political Islam and Foreign Policy in Europe and the United States’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 3(4): 345-367.
20. Torelli, S., Merone, F., and Cavatorta, F. 2013. ‘The Journey of the Tunisian Ennahda from Fundamentalist to Conservative Party’, Democratization, 20(5): 140-154.
Published
2017-04-19
How to Cite
CHEHOUDI, Rafaa. Tunisian Democratic Transition : Dynamics of Conflict and Reconciliation. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN HUMANITIES, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 603-609, apr. 2017. ISSN 2349-4379. Available at: <http://cirworld.com/index.php/jah/article/view/5907>. Date accessed: 19 oct. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.24297/jah.v5i1.5907.
Section
Articles