Internal Factors Influence on Project Management Maturity Assessment
The study acts as a pilot research to investigate the influence of organization’s internal dynamics on PMM assessment levels and to outline a methodology that can help us to quantify it. It aims to analyze the influence of organizations’ internal dynamics on project management maturity, (PMM), assessments and how they can change the assessment results. Specifically, it addresses the impact of internal organizational influences, like organization culture, leadership & leadership hierarchy, and emotional stability on the assessments of organization project management maturity. The methodological research approach for this study was a survey of 129 professionals. These professionals represent both manufacturing and service sectors industries that utilize project management extensively. Data were analyzed using multiple regression models with SPSS data processing results show that organization's internal factors significantly influence project management maturity assessments. The internal forces like organization culture and leadership/ leadership hierarchy significantly increase the PMM levels while emotional stability greatly reduces the PMM levels. These results can help upper management to better understand the PMM assessment results while academics can use it to amend maturity models and for conducting a more extensive longitudinal research.
. Fahrenkrog, S. L., Haeck, W., Abrams, F., & Whelbourn, D. (2003). PMI's organizational project management maturity model. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2003—North America, Baltimore, MD. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
. Kerzner, H. (2004). Advanced project management. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
. Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling(11th e.d.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
. Mullaly, M. (2006). Longitudinal analysis of project management maturity. Project Management Journal: Research Quarterly, 37(3), Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org/~/media/Members/Publications.ashx
. Crawford, J. K. (2006). The project management maturity model. Information Systems Management, Fall 2006, 23(4). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.emich.edu.
. Smith, D. A. (2010). Knowledge management as an indication of organizational maturity in project management: an enhancement of the opm3© model. Capella University. April 2010. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.emich.edu.
. Yazici, H. J. (2009). The role of project management maturity and organizational culture in perceived performance. Project Management Journal: Research Quarterly, 40(3), Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org/~/media/Members/Publications/ashx.
. Riollano, C. C. (2012). Uniformity of organizational culture with the organizational project management maturity model: an exploratory investigation. Capella University. October 2012. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.emich.edu.
. Saway, N & Trapanese, P. (2004). Measuring project management maturity. Security Distributing and Marketing Magazine. January 2004, 34(1). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.emich.edu.
. Khalema, L.S., van Waveren, C.C., & Chan, K.-Y. (2015). The relationship between project management office maturity and organizational project management maturity: An empirical study of the South African government infrastructure departments. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(3), 12-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.7166/26-3-1021.
. CBP Research 2007. State of the PMO 2007-2008. Havertown. PA: Taylor & Francis Group
. Jiang, J.J., Klein, G., Hwang, H.-G., Huang J. & Hung, S.-Y. 2004. An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management, 41(3), pp 279-288.
. Humphrey, W.S., Managing the Software Process, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.
. Ibbs, C. W. & Kwak, Y.-H. (2000). Assessing project management maturity. Project Management Journal, 31(1), 32–43.
. UK, Office of Government Commerce. (2008). P3M3 v2.0 Self Assessment. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.strategies-for-managing-change.com/support-files/maturity-model-self-assessment.pdf.
Copyright (c) 2018 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. The submitting author is responsible for securing any permissions needed for the reuse of copyrighted materials included in the manuscript.
While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.